Ruts vs. Battlespire CH4: BAbagsGS

By Rutskarn Posted Wednesday Apr 13, 2016

Filed under: Lets Play 41 comments

There’s no way around it; I am lost. Deeply, passionately, irreparably lost. I’m not sure where this space is relative to anywhere else and I’m not sure it even matters, as space and time themselves seem capricious, aloof, even spiteful. I gave up getting out of here fully intact some time ago. Now I’d settle for retaining just a shred of sanity, just an ounce of vitality–some souvenir of the man I was before I entered this hateful parallel dimension beyond mortal understanding.

I’m talking, of course, about my inventory screen.

Let’s take a modest gander. And by “modest gander,” I mean let’s settle once and for all how overbearingly asinine this system is so I can move on to grousing about bigger and better things. Behold:

Made up of equal parts polished art and elegant design.
Made up of equal parts polished art and elegant design.

Observe that there are currently ten item squares visible. “Visible” is an understatement; they’re massive, all the better to give us a good look at the chunky blurry inscrutable item images. Then we can look right down to the very bottom to see in tiny yellow text what a given item actually is.

Now, for a dungeon crawler developed for the PC, ten squares of visible inventory at a time is a terribly miserly quantity. If you asked me to pick my top ten favorite pieces of equipment in a given Bethesda game, I’d need spreadsheets and the aid of a counselor to narrow it down past fifteen. But here’s where the rub really comes in: column B on the right there isn’t for your inventory at all. It represents the dirty floor, DVD bargain bin, or pocket you’re rummaging. So trusting our fates in fickle arithmetic, that means there’s only–five slots visible at a time?

How would you like to try four?

See, that big square on top–taking up exactly as much real estate as the others–is just to indicate whether or not you’re currently looking inside a bag. How does it indicate that? By displaying an icon of a bag–the same icon that any of the squares below, when they happen to hold bags, will display. This is somewhat confusing in the beginning and annoying merely forever. And really, they needn’t have gone through the trouble, because I can solve this little mystery for you right now: yes, you are looking inside a bag. Most likely a bag inside another bag inside another bag. Because it turns out everything is bags now; your life is bags. Your high school sweetheart is a bag. Every night you close your bags and dream of the bags on bags your bags bags bags.

Battlespire is the only game I know of where you can take inventory and lose.

It quickly becomes clear that my inventory is 85% the following two items: floating mystical energy signatures fashioned by daedric magics, and burlap sacks. The sacks often contain two or more sacks within, as well as a few large weapons; the sacks in those sacks yield more sacks. Careful analysis turns up a few items of interest buried within these nesting containers, so I post up in an out-of-the-way alley to start conducting a painstakingly, painsmakingly thorough search. By the time I’m done there’s a stack of empty sacks reaching to the dungeon ceiling and a small pile of as-yet-undiscovered windfalls, which include:

  • A “Cape of Sanguine Golden Wisdom.” Again, I have no idea what this does and I’m not even sure I can check, but I do feel reasonably certain that I hope that I eventually find a cape not designed by burlesque taxidermists.
  • A variety of potions. I’m vague on what these do and have no intention of chugging them experimentally. If they’re useful, I don’t want to waste them. If they suck, I don’t want to start sucking. It’s a classic dilemma I intend to address by savescumming in lieu of intelligent resource management.
  • A couple of scrolls of Summon Plot Exposition.
  • A Cog of Flux Capacitation. That might sound like a lame joke, and it is, but for once it isn’t one of mine. That’s actually what it’s called.
  • Pants.
  • Fuck you, pants? HOW LONG HAVE I HAD THESE?

That's like six daedra I didn't need to show my balls before I killed them! I don't know why I'm yelling!
That's like six daedra I didn't need to show my balls before I killed them! I don't know why I'm yelling!

I don’t pretend to be an expert on this unknowable daedric invasion dimension, but I can only assume a pair of trousers and sanguine golden wisdom capes will prove to be valuable assets. Certainly more so than the dozen hemp sacks I pulled out of a scamp’s bushy legparts. Now, in the interests of being well and fully prepared, let’s try to read those damn story exposition scrolls.

Okay, so the bright side is that I now have some context for who the hell Vatasha Trenelle is and why I’d want to talk to her. The bad news is, approximately eighty-five percent of that message was landscaping-grade fantasy gravel and assorted enigma. I understand little of it and like little of what I understand. There’s only a couple things I’m sure of: for one, I’m going to have to find some keys or something. For another, I’m going to have to keep track of them in my inventory. Thirdly, we are all doomed.

...
...

NEXT WEEK: DON’T PRESS THE BUTTON

 


From The Archives:
 

41 thoughts on “Ruts vs. Battlespire CH4: BAbagsGS

  1. Grudgeal says:

    Wait, so if I’ve got this right…

    Each bag has four slots. Bags can contain other bags in any number of their own slots. Bags can be nested within bags infinitely. So you can essentially carry 4+(3n) non-bag items, where n is the number of bags you’ve got.

    Your inventory makes a mockery of physics. ‘Space’ no longer has any meaning, as any number of bags you carry contain bags bigger than themselves for eternity. The true eldritch horror of the game is not the final boss, it’s the inventory system.

    1. sheer_falacy says:

      No, it looks like you can scroll the inventory – you can only see 4 slots but more exist.

      Which raises the question of why you use bags at all. I guess you apparently find items in bags in bags and it’d be a nightmare to take them all out.

      1. Decius says:

        But you have to take them out to use them and do most of that work to even know what they are…

      2. Sleeping Dragon says:

        Giving the devs some benefit of the doubt I would suspect that they thought it was a feature. Considering how limited the inventory screen is the readily available bags are probably meant to help with sorting items. Of course this would be more useful if you could name, dye or otherwise mark them… and it in no way beats having an actual better inventory screen.

    2. Zaxares says:

      Truly, we have entered the Bagception. There is no escape from the Bagception.

    3. Mephane says:

      The inventory system was probably made the day after the programmer assigned to the task had learnt of recursion for the first time, and was absolutely thrilled to put it to use somewhere, anywhere.

      1. Tizzy says:

        Or is this lazy programming? Each inventory and bag has a fixed size in memory, so you don’t need to implement a fancy data structure?

        1. Mephane says:

          If you can only use pieces of memory of tightly limited size and need to piece those together into a larger data container, you don’t need to make it like this, i.e. nested and recursive. You can also just make a linked list of the pieces and iterate over them. And the code for the latter is the less risky and complicated one. To the user the result would look like a single large linear inventory, like in Skyrim.

          Of course I was jesting in my original comment. There is also the possibility some designer had a sudden idea “what if you could also put bags into these inventory slots, wouldn’t that be cool” and a programmer said “I can totally make that work”, and thus it was decided the game would have a recursive inventory of madness.

          However, the real madness is the UI. Anarchy Online had basically the same inventory system, you had a main inventory and you could put bags and boxes into it which act as another inventory, which can also hold bags and boxes, ad infinitum. But in AO you had decent screen size, you customize the size and position of the windows on the screen, you had different types of boxes with different icons and iirc you could even name them, move items by drag&drop etc.

          1. Bubble181 says:

            AO is from 2001, Battlespire for 97.

            There’s plenty of games of similar age with much better UI, but AO is an unfair example :p

        2. Humanoid says:

          Frustratingly, the size of the base backpack in WoW is fixed at 16, and has been since the game’s launch. Meanwhile, the size of the four additional bags you can carry has ballooned to double that size (or even more for specialty type bags). Whenever the issue is raised with the developers though, the response is that any attempt to increase the size of that default backpack causes catastrophic issues around corrupting every player’s entire inventory and items being lost into the ether.

          1. WJS says:

            Really?? I’d never heard that. That just makes me wonder what the hell they did, since any sane way of implementing it should have allowed the size to be upgraded relatively effortlessly, with the difference simply appearing as empty slots. Shrinking the backpack, sure, that’s just asking for trouble, but growing it? That should be easy. So what hath they wrought??

        3. Tom says:

          Hopefully just lazy programming and not Lazy Programming, otherwise there could literally be an infinite number of bags in the game.

    4. rofltehcat says:

      Oh! We did this in a MUD called Tibia: You could only carry so much weight but you could push infinite weight along the ground. So when you were out hunting monsters you’d only put the stuff with the best gold/weight ratio (usually gold pieces, sometimes gems or very rare items) into your backpack. And eventually, you’d even run out of capacity for carrying gold (gold was reasonably heavy).
      So what you’d do is form a “loot bag”: You’d have a bag that you’d either push along or hide somewhere (risky) in which you’d put all of the items dropped by monsters. Once that bag was full you’d find another bag (monsters dropped plenty) and put your loot bag into that one for another 7 inventory slots. After you finished hunting you’d then push that monstrosity of bags with items inside bags with items inside bags with items to the vendor and sell it all. At that point the loot bag would often weight many many tons.

      So I can only assume the developers of Tibia took their obsession with bags inside bags from this game. It really isn’t a bad way to organize things (use different kinds and colors of bags for potions etc.) inside your inventory but I really wouldn’t want to do it with just 4 visible slots.

      1. Ayegill says:

        The “carrying a physics object which contains your loot” trick is also handy in the newer Bethesda games (…and New Vegas)

        1. Danny White says:

          I tried that once, stored all my ill-gotten gains in the severed head of a raider and was halfway back to New Vegas before the game decided I was far enough away from the corpse that it could de-spawn. My first warning was when the head floating along in front of me winked out of existence, taking all my loot with it.

          1. Decus says:

            Corpses can de-spawn? Is that a console only thing or do you have to specifically set them to rather than specifically set them to not on PC? I have never seen that happen–I can return to the very first town in the game and there will still be dead powder gang/citizen corpses strewn about.

            1. Profugo Barbatus says:

              I think what happened here was the main body got far away enough to unload from the world, taking the giblets with it. There’s a corpse somewhere in that world, just packed full of loot.

          2. Tom says:

            Boo. Would’ve been much funnier if you’d suddenly been buried in a mountain of loot items instantly returned to full size.

        2. Humanoid says:

          The seemingly arbitrary assignment of some containers resetting and others being permanent makes it infuriatingly unreliable. In the end though, I was happiest playing these games once I dropped any pretense of realism and just used the console command to increase my carry weight by a couple orders of magnitude.

          Going back further, it was always great to add a “boot” to your magic carpet in Ultima 7 ….by placing a barrel on it. I have fond memories of that game’s emergent inventory management, but I’d probably hate it these days.

      2. So basically what you’re saying is that this was a precursor to Katamari Damacy?

  2. Daemian Lucifer says:

    Rutskarn*,you should definitely record a “inventory management” video for this game.

    *If that really is you and not a doppelganger that has assumed your name.

  3. Mephane says:

    Look at me. Look at you.
    Look at me. Look at you.
    Look at me. These tickets are now bags.

    I’m in a bag.

  4. ehlijen says:

    What’s in my pocketses, Bilbo Bag-ins?
    -It’s a trick question! There are more pockets in your pocket!

    1. Dev Null says:

      And in the more pockets, is Bilbo Baggins.

        1. ehlijen says:

          It’s boxes all the way inside out.

  5. And I thought the Ultima 5, 6, and 7 inventory management was insane. This actually beats that.

    1. Humanoid says:

      At least they had the courtesy to pause the game while you were looking at your inventory. Ultima 8 offered no such kindness, leaving the player to scramble around looking for that important spell or MacGuffin needed to progress while a horde of monsters bore down on them.

      You could still move while doing all that, of course, but that was somewhat of an unreliable approach given there was a giant opaque backpack graphic in the middle of the screen blocking your view.

      1. djw says:

        Fortunately, the Avatars secret power in U8 is the ability to outrun everything.

  6. Yummychickenblue says:

    Josh would have a field day in this game.

  7. Vermander says:

    With so much armor on your left leg and so little everywhere else I’m picturing you constantly high kicking like one of the Rockettes to block enemy attacks.

    1. Ratatoskz says:

      Return of The Bootlord?

      1. *a fairground organ spins up its old, worn can-can cylinder*

    2. Content Consumer says:

      Which makes the design of the cape even better.

  8. Kylroy says:

    This what happens when you trust your inventory management to the lowest bidder. Provided the lowest bidder is from St. Ives.

  9. Profugo Barbatus says:

    I’ve been playing Cataclysm DDA myself, and its got the exact opposite inventory problem that they’ve been working on. Items can be found in boxes and in bags, but one removed, can never be returned to the package. Inventory management in that game is “Have enough different floor tiles to dump shit onto in a sorted fashion.”

    I still wouldn’t trade it for this hell.

  10. Fists says:

    and people think it’s the console/controller gamers’ fault that the skyrim UI sucks! I have a dream that one day Bethesda will have more than one or two programmers and they’ll actually get to finish polishing some of the game systems.

  11. EmmEnnEff says:

    “Battlespire is the only game I know of where you can take inventory and lose.”

    Have you by any chance played Guild Wars 2 at level 80? Bags inside bags inside bags, bags with the same name that don’t stack, bags that are only dropped by a single event… I’ve never seen another game make getting loot as painful as it did.

  12. Adalore says:

    I was aware of this madness already due to LGR on youtube having reviewed it already, however it does not make it any less stupid.

    Just feels like “GUYS WE GOTTA SHOW OFF OUR AWESOME THREE-D GRAHFIX YEH” and nothing more with the spinning objects.

Thanks for joining the discussion. Be nice, don't post angry, and enjoy yourself. This is supposed to be fun. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

You can enclose spoilers in <strike> tags like so:
<strike>Darth Vader is Luke's father!</strike>

You can make things italics like this:
Can you imagine having Darth Vader as your <i>father</i>?

You can make things bold like this:
I'm <b>very</b> glad Darth Vader isn't my father.

You can make links like this:
I'm reading about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darth_Vader">Darth Vader</a> on Wikipedia!

You can quote someone like this:
Darth Vader said <blockquote>Luke, I am your father.</blockquote>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.